From tsallis@santafe.edu Wed Feb 8 18:04:48 2006 Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 07:17:26 -0600 From: Constantino TsallisTo: Douglas R. White Subject: Re: monolog plot question Doug, yes, you can. Start with the data series which is the UPPER one among those that you sent me in the Excel a few days ago. That one might be the easiest case to start with. Do like this: 1) Let us call y(x) your data. Estimate with your eye the EXTRAPOLATED value y(0) in the log-log plot that you sent me. 2) Calculate, for all x, y(x) / y(0) 3) Then calculate, for all x, z(x) = {[y(x) / y(0)]^(1-q) - 1} / (1-q) 4) Then plot in a linear-linear scale z(x) versus x for various values of q (say q=1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, etc...). The q that produces the "best straight" line provides you the estimate of q that you are looking for. 5) The SLOPE of the linear-linear plot z versus x directly provides you (- kappa). Then your data have been so fitted with y(x) = y(0) exp_q (- x / kappa) Comment (i): The "best straight line" can be found either by eye, or, more systematically, by making a linear regression, and choosing that value of q that gives the "linear correlation coefficient r" closest to unity. Comment (ii): Once you have a quite good set [y(0), q], you can slightly improve them. To do this you go back to your log-log representation that you sent me in the Excel, and change slightly around your pair [y(0), q] until you are satisfied the most. Comment (iii) Stefan Thurner / Vienna and I are just now writing a paper where we essentially follow the procedure that I described to you. I am attaching the figure we get, so that you will have an illustration in front of your eyes. The inset precisely shows the linear correlation coefficient r versus q, which allows a quite precise determination of q for our problem. Cheers and good luck! Constantino -------------------------- At 00:42 8/5/2005 -0700, you wrote: >I note from the Malacrne and Mendes paper 2nd page right that using their >generalized monolog plot that q can be estimated directly, independent of >the other parameters. > >Constantino, given the error bars, would you advising using that method to >estimate the q values in our city data? > >Doug [ Part 2, Application/POSTSCRIPT 23KB. ] [ Unable to print this part. ]